New York Times abruptly eliminates its “director of information security” position: “there is no need for a dedicated focus on newsroom and journalistic security.” Sounds like they are opening things up for Chinese/other influence and surveillance.
New York Times abruptly eliminates its “director of information security” position: “there is no need for a dedicated focus on newsroom and journalistic security.” Sounds like they are opening things up for Chinese/other influence and surveillance.